Cases 61 - 70 of 177
Marquez v. Cheney et al
as 4:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Trevor Ferrell Marquez
Defendant:
Brad Ryan Cheney, Paul Sheldon and Unknown St Cyr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bayse v. Holt et al
as 1:2017cv00962
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Bayse
Defendant:
A. Holt, Arthur Cheney, B. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McRae v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Stephen Plato McRae
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Iron County Correctional Facility, Purgatory Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conley v. Rivera et al
as 3:2016cv02083
Plaintiff:
John L Conley
Defendant:
Jose Rivera, Hicks, Goudreault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray v. Malanson et al
as 3:2016cv01923
Plaintiff:
Daniel McCray
Defendant:
Ryan Malanson, Rivera, VanNostrand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Annabel, II v. MDOC, et al
as 16-2532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ARAMARK CORPORATION, DANIEL H. HEYNS and others
Derrick Williams v. DOJ, et al
as 16-5273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derrick L. Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Loretta E. Lynch, John Walsh, U.S. Attorney of Colorado and others
Cheney v. USA
as 3:2016cv00178
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Paul Cheney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Annabel #414234 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00543
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Annabel #414234, II
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Aramark Corporation, Inc., Daniel Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cheney v. People of the State of California
as 2:2016cv01003
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Robert Lindsay Cheney, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
