Cases 61 - 70 of 137
(PC) Melger v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 1:2021cv01183
Plaintiff:
Thomas Joseph Melger
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nanney v. Dapartment of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2021cv02356
Plaintiff:
Mr. James D. Nanney and RENT-A-MAN Construction
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv01729
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Cooper, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe and Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Douglas v. Department of the Treasury
as 1:2021cv00617
Plaintiff:
Alexander Logan Douglas
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv05267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Radford v. Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2021cv02751
Plaintiff:
Frederick Radford
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chunn v. Department of the Treasury, IRS
as 4:2021cv05188
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Chunn
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, IRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richburg v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 4:2021cv05057
Plaintiff:
Leon Richburg
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chunn v. Department of the Treasury, IRS
as 6:2021cv00252
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, IRS
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Chunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richburg v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 1:2021cv01478
Plaintiff:
Leon Richburg
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
