Cases 61 - 70 of 89,874
Skinner v. Bowman et al
as 4:2024cv02267
Plaintiff:
Jessie P. Skinner
Defendant:
Jevon Bowman, C. Alexander, James Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casper v. USA
as 3:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
John M. Casper
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bazile v. Wolcott et al
as 1:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Kenny Bazile
Defendant:
Julie Wolcott, Donald Uhler, Mark Rockwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2024cv00951
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hawkins
Defendant:
The City of Eugene, John I-V Does and Eugene Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz v. Lujan Grisham et al
as 1:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
John Diaz
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan Grisham, Alisha Tofoya and New Mexico State Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baird v. Sharp et al
as 0:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Dewight Sheldon Baird
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Sharp, Sergeant T. Session and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
JOHN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02644
Plaintiff:
KASHAMBA JOHN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams-Dorsey v. County of Chenango et al
as 9:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Davonte Williams-Dorsey
Defendant:
County of Chenango, Chenango County Sheriff's Office, Chenango County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yancey v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
John B Yancey, Jr
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, D Earl, James Dycus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yancey v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
John B Yancey
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Christopher Johnson, K Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
