Cases 61 - 70 of 63,320
Watson v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv01037
Petitioner:
Edward L. Watson and Leonard Watson
Respondent:
Chadwick K. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kasyjanski v. Allyene et al
as 1:2024cv02278
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Kasyjanski
Defendant:
Jennifer Allyene, Kelly Lotnard, Nicole Chimenti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Pipkin v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02426
Plaintiff:
Byron Pipkin
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Captain Johnson, Sergeant Burks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atterberry v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
DeMarcus L. Atterberry
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Defendant:
Katie, Warden, Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Jones
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dusty Bowman v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11274
Plaintiff:
DUSTY L. BOWMAN
Defendant:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MR RICHARD COMERFORD, Deputy Secty of Institutions, WAKULLA CI WARDEN and others
COOPER v. SCOTT
as 2:2024cv07068
Petitioner:
TYSHON L. COOPER
Respondent:
BECKY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Boyd v. Bridgeport County Jail
as 3:2024cv01063
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Boyd
Defendant:
Bridgeport County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. AULD et al
as 1:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
JAY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Waddle v. Kosciusko County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Gage Waddle
Defendant:
Kosciusko County Sheriff, Sgt. Dan Mesa, Jake Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
