Cases 61 - 70 of 2,552
Oliver v. Edmound et al
as 7:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dan Oliver
Defendant:
Warden Edmound, Unit Manager Mr. Wooden, Lt. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County, Erik T Knapp, Scott Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Shugan et al
as 6:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Kamala H Shugar, Lane County DAs Office, Erick T. Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Knapp et al
as 6:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Erick T. Knapp, Lane Count DAs Office, Kamala H Shugar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Cooper et al
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Corbin Lane Curry
Defendant:
Cooper, Gilliam, Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Starks et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Lee Starks, John Doe, Ofc David Killop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv03007
Plaintiff:
Michael Crenshaw
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, . Holzer, . Edger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
MILTON LEWIS LANE, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lane v. Florence County Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Myron Tre-Mayne Lane
Defendant:
Florence County Detention Center, Andrea Capers, Q. Quick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Murray v. Knapp et al
as 6:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Erick T Knapp, Lane County DAs Office and Springfield PD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
