Cases 61 - 70 of 12,118
(HC) Taylor v. District Attorney
as 2:2024cv01400
Petitioner:
Robert A. Taylor
Respondent:
District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pickens v. Taylor
as 2:2024cv00596
Petitioner:
Demetrus Pickens
Respondent:
Warden Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Justin Johnson v. Jacob Schurman, et al
as 24-2002
Plaintiff:
Justin Johnson
Defendant:
Jacob Schurman, in his individual capacity only and Christopher Taylor, in his individual capacity only
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., SLONG, K. FINKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Militana et al
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Anthony N. Mason
Defendant:
Dr. Mark Militana, C. Riner, C. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Norman
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, C. Taylor and Jessica Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv02820
Plaintiff:
Tracy Taylor
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, J. Moeckly and C. Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dai-Juan Taylor v. Fulton County District Attorney, et al
as 24-11513
Plaintiff:
DAI-JUAN TAIKAIN TAYLOR
Defendant:
FULTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, POLICE CHIEF OF FAIRBURN, GA, FAIRBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Taylor v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Marquis Taylor
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
