Cases 71 - 80 of 690
Prudhomme v. Michles et al
as 3:2022cv01382
Plaintiff:
Adam Prudhomme
Defendant:
Marcus Michles, Rainey Booth, Adrian NLN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Booth
as 22-40340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adrian Campbell
Defendant / Appellee:
Patricia Hubert Booth, individually, Jason Bradford Libby, individually, Drew B. Tipton, individually and others
HERRING v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
JAMES HERRING
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER CHARLIE WARD, WARDEN BERRY, WARDEN PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booth v. Berry
as 1:2022cv02060
Petitioner:
Delroy T. Booth
Respondent:
Warden Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Booth v. Anderson
as 3:2022cv00398
Petitioner:
Terrence M. Booth
Respondent:
David Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
West v. Grant et al
as 1:2022cv01115
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Littlebear West
Defendant:
Jay Grant, City of Denver, David Booth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Booth
as 22-978
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Kevin Thompson, AKA James Moore
Defendant:
RN Charlotte Peterson, CO Salerno, MD Hill and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Sgt. Troy Booth
Phillip Bloodworth v. Mark Pouperd, et al
as 22-3445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP BLOODWORTH
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER MARK POUPERD, JOHN DOE 1, 1st Shift Commander, CORRECTION OFFICER FORD and others
Booth #258291 v. Artis et al
as 1:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Booth #258291
Defendant:
Unknown Artis and Unknown King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals et al
as 5:2022ct03117
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Taylor
Defendant:
4th Circuit Court of Appeals, Stubbs Perdue, Attorneys at Law, Christopher Venters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
