Cases 71 - 80 of 330
Holbrook v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2021cv00170
Defendant:
Major Flemming, Albright, Endicott and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch v. Gittere et al
as 3:2021cv00136
Defendant:
Rowley, William Gittere, Gloria Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montez v. Forshey
as 3:2021cv00643
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Petitioner:
Jeno Diamond Montez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montez v. Forshey
as 2:2021cv01029
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Petitioner:
Jeno Diamond Montez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McVeigh v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Renee McVeigh, Joni R. Diamond, Nellie Ruth Taylor and others
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Parole, Kay Ivey, Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VENERI v. THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT et al
as 2:2020cv06394
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JOHN VENERI, JR.
Respondent:
BURNJUO NEURANDON, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MELISSA HAINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jaramillo v. Padilla et al
as 1:2020cv01286
Defendant:
Robert Gonzales and Christopher Padilla
Plaintiff:
Diamond Jaramillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. Doe Officers, Van Buren Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv02232
Defendant:
John Doe Officers, Van Buren Police Department, Angela Morgan, Van Buren Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Blake Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAMOND v. WARD et al
as 5:2020cv00453
Defendant:
JACK SAULS, ARETHA SMITH, RODNEY JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY DIAMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. Ward et al
as 1:2020cv04764
Defendant:
Jack Sauls, Aretha Smith, Rodney Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
