Cases 71 - 80 of 932
Christopher Collings v. Cindy Griffith
as 23-1064
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher Collings
Respondent / Appellee:
Cindy Griffith
GREEN v. SULLIVAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
TYLER DALE GREEN
Defendant:
SULLIVAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, FOGALSONT DAVIS, JEFF GRIFFITH and others
Interested Party:
SULLIVAN COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd et al v TDCJ
as 6:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Andre D Boyd, Norris Hicks, Dennis Mayes and others
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKee v. Halsey et al
as 3:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
Jerry McKee
Defendant:
Barbara Halsey, Daniel Stidham, Adam Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TWITCHELL v. GRIFFITH et al
as 2:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
DEVAN ROBERT TWITCHELL
Defendant:
JEFFREY GRIFFITH, CARA DEMOSS, TRIGBEY BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2022cv01398
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gray
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Ryan Nottingham, Teri A Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. Lumpkin, TDCJ Director
as 6:2022cv01143
Petitioner:
Charles Griffith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffith v. Dannhauser
as 22-2733
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jelahn Julian Griffith
Defendant / Appellee:
Jess Dannhauser, Frank Cresciullo, Albert A. Benjamin and others
Griffith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00412
Petitioner:
Charles Griffith
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRIFFITH v. HENDRIX et al
as 2:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
KYLE RAY GRIFFITH
Defendant:
JAY HENDRIX, C. HOLCOMB, TAWNI TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
