Cases 71 - 80 of 25,827
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 7:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Jones, FNU Firmburn, FNU Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
C Jones, D. Luke, FNU Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JONES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
SCOTT RYAN JONES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. MCLEAN et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
YAW NYADU HARRISON
Defendant:
ZERRANTI MCLEAN, JOHN DOE, MR. NEU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv04054
Plaintiff:
Santos Gerardo Mendoza and Santos Gerardo Mendoza Castellon
Defendant:
Lieutenant Ross, Jailer McMores, Sergeant Heartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jones v. Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00928
Petitioner:
Wayne E. Jones
Respondent:
Richard J Donovan Correctional Facility, J. Hill, California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation Administration Policy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 1:2024cv00862
Petitioner:
George E. Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
STEWART v. BLAKNEY et al
as 2:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
BEN ROBERT STEWART
Defendant:
JAMES BLAKNEY, DORTHEA BARNS, IEASHA EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Derek Lee Jones
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail and Armark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
