Cases 71 - 80 of 222
Pann #254048 v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 1:2014cv01074
Plaintiff:
Robert Pann #254048
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Prison Health Services, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #202759 v. Stoddard et al
as 1:2014cv00938
Plaintiff:
Frank Egan Smith #202759
Defendant:
Cathleen Stoddard, J. Schad, E. McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman Wilkerson v. Shannon Taylor
as 14-7012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN KEVIN WILKERSON, the Atty-in-Fact on behalf of inmate Norman Kevin Wilkerson
Defendant - Appellee:
SHANNON TAYLOR, WILLIAM WALLACE DAVENPORT, THOMAS MATTHEW MCKENNA and others
RICKS v. UDIJOHN et al
as 3:2014cv04079
Plaintiff:
RAMON RICKS
Defendant:
JAMES UDIJOHN, JAMES NIZOLAK, BILL PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. De La Cruz
as 14-2210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mendelsshon Perez
Defendant - Appellee:
MTA Police Officer "John" De La Cruz, Shield number and first name unknown, Ruddy De La Cruz, Reaymond McDermott, Director of Security Assistant Director and others
Wilkerson v. Taylor et al
as 2:2014cv00294
Plaintiff:
Norman Kevin Wilkerson
Defendant:
Shannon Taylor, William Davenport, Thomas McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hankerson v. Warner et al
as 3:2014cv05237
Plaintiff:
Cullen M. Hankerson
Defendant:
Bernie Warner, Pat Donahoe, Rob McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cullen Hankerson v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 13-36160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CULLEN M. HANKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BERNIE WARNER, ROBERT MCKENNA and others
Genier v. VanArnum et al
as 9:2013cv01460
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Genier, Sr.
Defendant:
Sergeant VanArnum and Captain McKenna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorpe v. Village of Cambridge et al
as 9:2013cv00902
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Thorpe
Defendant:
Eugene McKenna , William Breyear and Aron Bassett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
