Cases 71 - 80 of 976
Harrison v. Partain et al
as 4:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Marcus Harrison
Defendant:
H. Partain, Cpl P. Hollie, Sgt D. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Carruthers - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Westville Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Antwan M Carruthers, Eye Keyla M Carruthers Washington and Antwan M Carruthers Washington
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility, Westvile Controle Unit and Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
HALL v. HICKS et al
as 1:2023cv01752
Plaintiff:
SIVAJI HALL
Defendant:
MARCUS O. HICKS, BRUCE DAVIS, JAMES STIGLIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. Haley, et al
as 23-1098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CHAD NOLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN HALEY, JACE MCCALL, THE 16TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Nolan v. Edge
as 2:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Aldridge Nolan
Defendant:
USA, E Kessel and C Edge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nolan Cyre v. USA
as 23-35341
Petitioner / Appellant:
NOLAN PAUL CYRE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nolan v. Nines et al
as 1:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Nolan
Defendant:
Warden Jeff Nines, Correctional Officer Keith Markle and Asst. Warden Keith Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Jeffrey Nines
as 23-6317
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JEFFREY NINES, RONALD STOTLER, Chief of Security and MS. SHARON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
