Cases 81 - 90 of 1,283
Oliver v. Brooks et al
as 1:2022cv00797
Plaintiff:
Uriah L Oliver
Defendant:
Nicholas Brooks, Joshua Wilson and NP Carolyn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. Harris et al
as 6:2022cv01188
Petitioner:
Harrell A. Gastong, VI and Anthony Gastong Harrell
Respondent:
S. Harris, Carolyn Caitlin, Hillsborough County Inc., Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andre Sweeper v. Vernetia Dozier
as 22-6673
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE SWEEPER
Defendant / Appellee:
VERNETIA DOZIER, LIEUTENANT ARELIA MATHIS, LIEUTENANT CAROLYN MURDOCK and others
Young v. McClendon et al
as 3:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Charles Young and Charles Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn McClendon and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samano v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv00508
Petitioner:
Carolyn Samano
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ray v. Henderson County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ray
Defendant:
Henderson County, Tennessee, Judge Steve Beal, 26th District Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steve Audette v. US
as 22-6471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE AUDETTE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DR. NOGO, DR. BYRON HERBAL and others
Hicks v. Finch et al
as 2:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
John Hicks
Defendant:
Keith Finch, Katrice Anderson, Carolyn Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Babcock et al
as 1:2022cv00517
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Lewis Babcock, Phillip Wieser, Cole Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wieser, et al
as 22-1057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PHILLIP WIESER, MARK ANDRIES, COLE JACOB WOODWARD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
