Cases 81 - 90 of 976
Martin v. Adams et al
as 6:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Nolan Craig Martin
Defendant:
Warden Adams, Warden Chambers and Mr. Tool
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. Edge
as 2:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Aldridge Nolan
Defendant:
USA, E Kessel and C Edge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Meraz v. Cantrell et al
as 5:2023cv05044
Plaintiff:
Jerome M Meraz
Defendant:
Sheriff Jay Cantrell, Captain Nolan, Corporal Tom Mulvaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ortiz v. Campos, et al.
as 1:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Ortiz
Defendant:
Laura Campos, Nolan and Dimmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. Salmonsen
as 6:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
Donnie Nolan
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Floyd v. Nines et al.
as 1:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Ninet "et al.", Jeffrey Nines and Ronald Stotler, .
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Preston v. Unidentified Defendants
as 3:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Frederick Charles Preston, Jr
Defendant:
Unidentified Defendants, Pat Smith, Nolan Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. Corizon Correctional Health care
as 1:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Nolan
Defendant:
Corizon Correctional Health care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Nines
as 1:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Jeffery Nines and Chief of Security Ronald Stotler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Hansen et al
as 1:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
Donna Hansen, Cleveland Friday, Ms. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
