Cases 1 - 10 of 7,244
Robinson v. Buffalo County et al
as 8:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
Buffalo County, City of Kearney, Shawn Eatherton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estes v. Missouri Court of Appeals et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Estes
Defendant:
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eric S. Schmitt, Karen L. Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dixon v. Clendenin et al
as 2:2024cv01740
Plaintiff:
Robert Dixon
Defendant:
Stephanie Clendenin and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espericueta v. TDCJ Classification and Records
as 4:2024cv00573
Petitioner:
Brandon Espericueta
Respondent:
TDCJ Classification and Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Godiwalla
as 2:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keith Taylor
Defendant:
Shirley Godiwalla, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Stirling et al
as 8:2024cv03577
Plaintiff:
Matthew McCoy
Defendant:
Director Bryan Stirling, Dennis Patterson, Willie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Scott v. USA
as 4:2024cv00517
Petitioner:
Brandon Desha Scott
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rettstatt v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Rettstatt
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Joe Page, III, Micheal Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Bradley Haag v. Jeff Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv05111
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Haag
Defendant:
Warden Jeff Macomber, Ron Broomfield, Joseph Poick and others
Respondent:
Brandon Strobelt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheat, Loyd B. v. Denton
as 2:2024cv14192
Plaintiff:
Loyd Brandon Wheat
Defendant:
Nita Gail Denton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
