Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jenkins v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv00348
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Jenkins
Defendant:
United States of America, Correctional Officer Key, Lieutenant B. Fuqua and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Terrell v. Parks et al
as 1:2025cv00414
Plaintiff:
Brooks Terrell
Defendant:
M Parks and B Fuqua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuqua v. Thornell
as 25-4323
Petitioner:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION
Jones v. Formen et al
as 3:2025cv03097
Plaintiff:
Demetrious Jones
Defendant:
Ricky Formen, Justin Fuqua and Beverly Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuqua v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 3:2025cv02029
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fuqua
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuqua v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 5:2025cv02040
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fuqua
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuqua v. Buffalo County Sheriff
as 4:2024cv03133
Plaintiff:
Joshua Alan Fuqua
Defendant:
Buffalo County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrence Fuqua v. Tricia Pretorius
as 24-1924
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIUS
Petitioner:
TERRENCE J. FUQUA
CHATMAN et al v. LOCKE et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
DAJUNT CHATMAN, DAJUNT PORTER, LASHAN BRYANT and others
Defendant:
DETECTIVE NORMAN LOCKE, OFFICER KIRK KOTCHIG, DAVID REICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. KUHN ESQ. et al
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM ALLEN
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
