Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Andrew Jackson, Jr. v. Kimberly Kessons, et al
as 24-1447
Plaintiff:
Andrew Paul Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimberly Kessons, Records, Iowa Medical and Classification Center, Chris Trip, Warden, Iowa State Penitentiary, Rebecca Bowker, Grievance Officer, Iowa State Penitentiary and others
Jackson v. Kessons et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Andrew Paul Jackson, Jr and Andrew Paul Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimberly Kessons, Chris Trip, Rebecca Bowker and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAUL v. WATSON
as 2:2021cv00471
Petitioner:
LEE ANDREW PAUL
Respondent:
T.J WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Capps v. Lorts
as 4:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
Andrew Paul Capps
Defendant:
Steve Lorts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Capps v. Kelly
as 4:2021cv00090
Plaintiff:
Andrew Paul Capps
Defendant:
Dionne Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2020cv00406
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Linda Koechle, Beth Skinner and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Paul Jackson, Jr
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaffer v. Shinn et al
as 3:2020cv08157
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Andrew Paul Schaffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marble v. Missoula County et al
as 9:2020cv00089
Defendant:
Michael Dominick, Missoula County Attorney's Office, Brad Giffin and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Marble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul v. USA
as 0:2019cv02613
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lee Andrew Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Parker v. Baltimore County Police Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv03512
Defendant:
Baltimore County Police Dept., Steven Scheinin, Sandra A. O'Connor and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Paul Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
