Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Ross v. Finkle et al
as 8:2024cv00915
Plaintiff: Arthur Lee Ross
Defendant: Brandon L. Finkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. USA
as 3:2024cv00245
Petitioner: Arthur Lee Monroe, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
JONES v. SLOWN
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff: ARTHUR LEE JONES, IV
Defendant: L. SLOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00164
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur Sanford v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6964
Petitioner / Appellant: ARTHUR LEE SANFORD
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir.; Virginia DOC, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia DOC and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia DOC
GIVENS v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2023cv00740
Plaintiff: ARTHUR LEE GIVENS
Defendant: DR. (FNU) COLLINS, CAPTAIN (FNU) INGRAM, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. USA
as 2:2023cv01450
Petitioner: ARTHUR LEE DAVIS, III
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
GIVENS v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00609
Plaintiff: ARTHUR LEE GIVENS
Defendant: SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and GANG MEMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. SLOWN et al
as 3:2023cv00089
Plaintiff: ARTHUR LEE JONES, IV
Defendant: L. SLOWN, K. LEEK, NOAH ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierson v. Lumpkin
as 23-10155
Petitioner / Appellant: Arthur Lee Pierson, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?