Cases 1 - 10 of 797
Mink v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024cv00484
Petitioner:
Damon Lee Mink
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00480
Petitioner:
Bryan Frank Perry
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bridges #343258 v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bridges #343258
Defendant:
Unknown Rhodes and Kathy Sherwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CLARENCE BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01248
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Walker, Terrance Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00439
Petitioner:
Christopher J Barnett
Respondent:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Ward et al
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Bridges
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Warden Walter Berry, Eric Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leach v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00433
Petitioner:
Nicholas J Leach
Respondent:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. USA
as 1:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Luterres Montez Bridges
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Moss, British v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv21546
Plaintiff:
British Moss
Defendant:
Terry Browne, Cary Dobson, Angela Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
