Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00587
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Quincey Sanders, Paul Alvin Womack, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Gregory L. Reaser and others
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Steven T. Marshall, Louis V. Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00929
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Treundous Qwavon Davis, Dameon Tunnell Stewart and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson King, Sharon Folks, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Steven Christopher Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hester v. United States of America et al.
as 4:2020cv00066
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, State Of Texas, Special Agent Jenifer Sparks and others
Plaintiff:
Tyton Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Kelley et al
as 4:2019cv00944
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Corrections et al
as 5:2016cv00198
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon Hayes
Defendant:
Dept of Corrections, Linton Jacobs, Billy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss v. W.C.C.R.F. et al
as 1:2013cv00111
Plaintiff:
John C. Doss
Defendant:
W.C.C.R.F., Billy Jones, David Hooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Billy Cotton v. Secretary, FL DOC
as 13-10632
Petitioner - Appellant:
BILLY JONES COTTON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Pierce v. Rasco, et al.
as 2:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
Jairie T. Pierce, Jr.
Defendant:
Bill Rasco, Keith Kite, Billy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotton v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2012cv20598
Plaintiff:
Billy Jones Cotton
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
