Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,203
Barton v. Boyd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2024cv00180
Plaintiff: James Barton
Defendant: Taggart Boyd, Michele Wilholm, Case Manager Hassan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Mobley v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5477
Plaintiff: KENNETH MOBLEY
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN F. J. BOWERS, FCI Memphis and others
Borker v. Warden Bowers
as 1:2024cv11254
Petitioner: Vitaly Borker
Respondent: Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Howe #303244 v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv01070
Plaintiff: Charles Howe
Defendant: Lupe Reyes, Christine Johnston, Catherine Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Bowers
as 1:2024cv11243
Petitioner: Arthur Miles
Respondent: Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Trice v. Unknown et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff: Raymond J. Trice
Defendant: Unknown, Chad Nixon, Matt Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguiar v. Bowers
as 1:2024cv10987
Petitioner: Stephen Aguiar
Respondent: Fred Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Caldwell v. Bowers et al
as 6:2024cv06051
Plaintiff: Samuel Walter Caldwell
Defendant: Deputy Director Syrna Bowers, MEDICAL SERVICES MGR Dana Haynes, RN Kelly Aunspaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Edmond et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff: Darryl Crenshaw
Defendant: Edmond, Bowers and Daugherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Bowers Towing et al.
as 5:2024cv00463
Plaintiff: Jeffrey L. Anderson
Defendant: Bowers Towing and Akron Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?