Cases 1 - 10 of 31
McAlister v. Young et al
as 7:2024cv00454
Defendant:
C/O C. Alexander, C/O Price, Cpl. Brookman and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Ryan McAlister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skinner v. Bowman et al
as 4:2024cv02267
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Aaron McFarland, Cynthia Tilley and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie P. Skinner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Alexander
as 24-30260
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Demitoris C. Alexander, also known as Big Tachi, also known as Big Dog
Doville v. Greenway et al
as 0:2023cv05003
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daerell Doville
Defendant:
Eric Greenway, Col. Quandara Grant, Major Latasha Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Gibson v. Durfey et al
as 2:2022cv03792
Plaintiff:
Klain Gibson
Defendant:
Officer M. Durfey, Officer J. Smith, Officer E. Fain and others
Interested Party:
ip state of ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Davis et al
as 2:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Darian Foster
Defendant:
Client Davis, Steve Herrick, Ross Mauice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Alexander
as 2:2022cv02029
Petitioner:
Eddie Warner
Respondent:
Anthony C. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALEXANDER v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00190
Defendant:
CHARLENE WARREN, WELL PATH HEALTH CARE, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY C. ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Parrack et al
as 3:2021cv03005
Defendant:
Leo Miller, . Dawson, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. USA
as 3:2020cv00717
Petitioner:
Demitoris C. Alexander
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
