Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
PASSMORE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00533
Defendant: WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, ROBERT CARTER, JR., ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL PASSMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Smith
as 17-1450
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jamal Cox
Defendant - Appellee: T. Smith, Correctional Officer, J. Horbett, Correctional Officer, C. Petties, Correctional Officer and others
Jackson v. Langley et al
as 9:2016cv00191
Defendant: Langley, Shaun B Munson, Ashley L Crawford and others
Plaintiff: Jackson and Eddie Lee Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettis v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2013fp00531
Respondent: FCI Berlin, Warden
Petitioner: William C. Pettis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cox v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2013cv06497
Plaintiff: Jamal Cox
Defendant: T. Smith, J. Horbett, C. Petties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. William Petti We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-7155
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: WILLIAM C. PETTIS, a/k/a Bobby
Pettis v. USA
as 5:2011cv80353
Petitioner: William C. Pettis
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pettis v. USA
as 5:2010cv80296
Petitioner: William C. Pettis
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pettis v. USA
as 5:2010cv80289
Petitioner: William C. Pettis
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ROE et al v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2007cv00962
Plaintiff: JESSE JOE ROE, BROWNIE SALMONS, JAMES FORD and others
Defendant: MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD and JASON FORSYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?