Cases 1 - 10 of 855
Contreras-Hernandez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Jose Contreras-Hernandez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant:
Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drew v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2024cv08073
Plaintiff:
Corey Drew
Defendant:
Yavapai, County of, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office, Dennis M McGrane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Herber Otoniel Luna Contreras
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. District Attorney of Edwards County
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
John A. Contreras
Defendant:
District Attorney of Edwards County and Judge of the 452nd District of Edwards County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Contreras v. Baysore et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Martinez Contreras
Defendant:
Warden D. Baysore and FCI Yazoo City Medium
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramiro Contreras v. Bibb County CF Warden
as 24-10996
Petitioner:
RAMIRO DELREAL CONTRERAS
Respondent:
BIBB COUNTY CF WARDEN
Contreras v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Contreras
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
