Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Ryans v. Shelby County Sherrifs Jail Division et al
as 2:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
Suamark D. Ryans
Defendant:
Shelby County Sherrifs Jail Division and City of Memphis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00355
Petitioner:
Danny C. Hoskins
Respondent:
Warden
Defendant:
Warden Weber, Corizon Correctional Health care and Dr. Stephan D. Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bastos v. Micci et al
as 1:2021cv10228
Defendant:
Joshua D Ryan, Carol A Micci and Sheila Creighton Kelly
Plaintiff:
Carlos A Bastos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Draper et al
as 2:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Philip Davis, Shane Stanton, Zachary Rich and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Anthony Cox, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Locker et al
as 6:2020cv00467
Defendant:
Zack McBride, D Ryan Locker and Danny Buck Davidson
Plaintiff:
Tyreese Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RYAN v. DOE
as 4:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
STEVE D RYAN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marino v. Watts
as 18-997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vincent Michael Marino
Defendant - Appellee:
Deborah G. Schult, Warden/BOP/DOJ, Sepanek, Counselor / BOP/DOJ and Lucas, Case Manager/BOP/DOJ
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, General Counsel /BOP/DOJ, Robert Helms, SIS Lieutenant/DOJ, Jason Poirier, Correctional Officer /BOP/DOJ and others
Clark v. McLaughlin et al
as 8:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
Hammel J. Clark
Defendant:
Beverly McLaughlin, Robustiano Barrera, Ashrah Mahboob and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. Armor Health et al
as 2:2017cv01156
Plaintiff:
Bobby D Ryan
Defendant:
Armor Health and Milwaukee County House of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montrond v. Spencer et al
as 1:2017cv10505
Plaintiff:
Amaral Montrond
Defendant:
Luis Spencer, Thomas Turco, III, Michael Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
