Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Mitchell v. Bishop et al
as 1:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Jason Daniel Mitchell, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Bishop and First Choice Motors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. The City of Bay Minette, AL Police Dept. et al
as 1:2020cv00484
Defendant:
Leonard F. Mikul, Tucker Dorsey, John Cox, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy O' Neal Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Daniel Davis
as 18-35112
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL MITCHELL DAVIS, AKA Daniel M. Davis
Matthew Ballister, III v. Union Cty Prosec Homicide Div, et al
as 17-2082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW J. BALLISTER, III
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION COUNTY PROSECUTORS HOMICIDE TASK FORCE, DETECTIVE SERGEANT JORGE JIMENEZ, DETECTIVE ROBERT HENDERSON and others
Mitchell v. George et al
as 3:2017cv00099
Respondent:
Rodrigo George and Sheila Lorance
Petitioner:
Isaiah Daniel Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BALLISTER v. UNION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S HOMOCIDE TASK FORCE et al
as 2:2015cv07655
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J BALLISTER, III
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S HOMOCIDE TASK FORCE, JORGE JIMENEZ, ROBERT HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Prater et al
as 3:2015cv50060
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mitchell
Defendant:
Timothy Prater, Phillips and Rick Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell #246238 v. MacLaren
as 2:2014cv00148
Petitioner:
Michael Daniel Mitchell #246238
Respondent:
Duncan MacLaren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dodson v. BOP et al
as 3:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jodi Darlene Dodson
Defendant:
BOP, Bannum, Inc., Carolyn Dunson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Williams et al
as 8:2011cv01367
Plaintiff:
Steven D Davis
Defendant:
A Williams, Lomax, Danielle Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
