Cases 1 - 10 of 50,752
TAYLOR v. PLATT et al
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRETT TAYLOR
Defendant:
DAVID PLATT, OJO, EMMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhone #245225 v. NaphCare Incorporated
as 2:2024cv01444
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Rhone
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Thaxton et al
as 5:2024cv03100
Plaintiff:
David Allen Gibson
Defendant:
(fnu) Thaxton, (fnu) Soptic, Jerome Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Serrano-Munoz v. USA
as 1:2024cv00993
Petitioner:
David Serrano-Munoz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bixler v. Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kagan Cole Bixler
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and David Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03097
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PERALTA-ROSARIO v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv07038
Petitioner:
DAVID PERALTA-ROSARIO
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
BERENATO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA
as 2:2024cv02609
Petitioner:
DAVID M. BERENATO
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LANE v. VANATA et al
as 2:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN LANE
Defendant:
BRIANNA C. VANATA, DAVID RUSSO and MATTHEW RUCINSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Estate of Guadalupe T. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv02254
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gonzalez
Defendant:
Estate of Guadalupe T. Gonzalez, Charles Griffin, David N. Longoria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
