Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Nichols v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Demetrius H. Nichols
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Dr. Garcia, K Osmundon and others
Petitioner:
Jeffrey J. Neslund and Michael D. Robbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young #092391 v. Unknown Party
as 2:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
James Young and James E Young
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Young v. Dean Mulvaine, et al
as 22-3733
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON E. YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN MULVAINE, Correctional Counselor at NCCC, BENJAMIN BLANKENSHIP, Correctional counselor at NCC, in Marion C&D Unit, RUBEN QUINTERO, Major at NCCC and others
ORTIZ v. P.I.C.C.
as 2:2021cv03813
Plaintiff:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
P.I.C.C., C/O: GIBSON, C/O: BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Assistant Warden of Operations et al
as 1:2021cv00663
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. Young
Defendant:
Sellers, Assistant Warden of Operations, Tina Tomaras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. McMahon
as 2:2020cv03974
Respondent:
R Knox McMahon
Petitioner:
Cleveland E Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
YOUNG v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv05059
Defendant:
JANE DOE, D. TOMAW, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Aramark Correctional Service LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02823
Defendant:
Ryan James and Aramark Correctional Service LLC
Plaintiff:
Aaron E. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Coleman et al
as 1:2019cv03138
Plaintiff:
Tunzy Antwain Sanders
Defendant:
Doyet A. Early, III, Alan Wilson, Chandra E. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Trinity Services Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02465
Plaintiff:
Aaron E Young
Defendant:
Brad Smith and Trinity Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
