Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Mitchell v. Eichele et al
as 2:2023cv04224
Plaintiff:
Curtis Mitchell
Defendant:
Kimberly Eichele, Ryan Williams, Raina Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eichel v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv02019
Plaintiff:
Mary Anne Eichel
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eichel v. Walz et al
as 3:2021cv00190
Defendant:
Joe Doe, Correct Care Solutions, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Albert C. Eichel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardee v. Walz et al
as 3:2020cv00729
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Harold Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
John T. Hardee, Bryan Herrion, Cedric Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Oleson v. Spalding, et al
as 13-3484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT R. OLESON
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. SPALDING, MS. BROWN, MR. DONAHUE and others
Defendant:
MR. HEFFRON, SANTOS, PORCARRO and others
Albert Eichel v. MacDonald
as 12-7997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT CHARLES EICHEL
Defendant - Appellee:
MACDONALD, Ms.; Chapline and BENNETT, Ms.; Major
Eichel v. MacDonoald et al
as 1:2012cv01248
Plaintiff:
Albert Charles Eichel
Defendant:
MacDonoald and Sarah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eichel v. MacDonoald et al
as 1:2012cv01220
Plaintiff:
Albert Charles Eichel
Defendant:
MacDonoald and Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OROZCO-BARAJAS v. ZICKEFOOSE et al
as 1:2011cv03628
Plaintiff:
SERGIO OROZCO-BARAJAS
Defendant:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, ABIGIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE, SAMIR SULAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIOS-SALINAS v. DE LASALLE et al
as 1:2011cv02036
Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO RIOS-SALINAS
Defendant:
ABIGAIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE, WILLIAMS, LYNN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
