Cases 1 - 10 of 650
WOULLARD v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant:
R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS, DONALD LEAVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01663
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Raymond v. Poinsett County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Heith Jonathan Raymond
Defendant:
Poinsett County Jail, Susan Duffle, Elliot Nooner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Unknown Officers et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Elliot H Brown
Defendant:
Unknown Officers, CO Cornhog, Milwaukee County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. State of Texas
as 24-40205
Plaintiff:
Jacque Kenshashwa Washington
Defendant:
State of Texas, City of Freeport, Texas, Brazoria County Court at Law No. 4 and others
Ramsey Randall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, et al
as 24-1512
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ELLIOT L. SMEAL, Parole Manager, (PBPP) CHAIR MANWOMAN, (Name Unknown) and others
Vincent Wilson v. Richard Ashby
as 24-6221
Plaintiff:
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON
Defendant:
DR. RICHARD B. ASHBY, DR. ASIA SWAIN and DR. YASAS RODRIGO
Wilson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Vincent Elliot Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vincent Wilson v. Luduena Morales
as 24-6102
Plaintiff:
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON
Defendant:
LUDUENA MORALES, Deputy, #361, LIEUTENANT DOZIER, #968, J. BURGESS, Major, #685 and others
Finch v. Kilgore et al
as 7:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Matthew Finch
Defendant:
Major Kilgore, Todd Tatum, Lt. Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
