Cases 1 - 10 of 6,544
Earls v. Blythe
as 2:2024cv02161
Defendant:
Deputy Bryan Blythe
Plaintiff:
Jesse Floyd Earls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 5:2024cv00710
Petitioner:
Earl Lee Dorey
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter Sr v. Martuscello III et al
as 1:2024cv09896
Defendant:
Leticia James, Daniel F. Martuscello III and Department of Law
Plaintiff:
David Earl Carter Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. TDCJ
as 2:2024cv00262
Petitioner:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Respondent:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Bonilla v. Earl et al
as 2:2024cv03596
Defendant:
Coleman A. Blease, Laurie M Earl, Ronald B. Robie and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Halstead v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv03052
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Earl Halstead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stanley Davis v. Jeffrey Howard
as 24-2084
Petitioner:
STANLEY EARL DAVIS
Respondent:
JEFFREY NEAL HOWARD, Warden
Robinson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02227
Petitioner:
Kenneth Earl Robinson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bean v. City Of Richmond et al
as 7:2024cv00878
Defendant:
Jason S. Miyares, City Of Richmond, Jerrauld C. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Euphrates Earl Bean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. TDCJ
as 2:2024cv01046
Defendant:
TDCJ
Plaintiff:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
