Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Cowan v. Seesar et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Felix Lyle Cowan
Defendant:
Christopher Seesar, Jack B Wienstien, David Hittner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIRANT v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02290
Petitioner:
JAMIL M. PIRANT
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cowan v. Lilly
as 23-10318
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Felix Lyle Cowan
Defendant / Appellee:
Eli Lilly, Pharmecutecal Company, Jack B. Wienstien, Honorable, U.S. Senior District Judge, Settlement Special Master's and Christopher Seegar, Attorney of Seegar Wiess L.L.P (New York)
Cowan v. Lilly et al
as 3:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Felix Lyle Cowan
Defendant:
Eli Lilly, Jack B Wienstien and Christopher Seegar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Eli Lilly & Company
as 1:2021cv04237
Plaintiff:
Tyler A. Thomas
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joyce #251901 v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 2:2020cv00208
Defendant:
David Dawdy, Susan L. Clark, Ashlee J. Hansinger and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric R. Joyce #251901
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WELLPATH HEALTH CARE et al
as 1:2019cv01034
Defendant:
ROCKY JOYNER, DR. BASHOLM, B. SLATER and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lujan v. Lilly et al
as 1:2019cv00148
Defendant:
Eli Lilly, Chase Bank, S. Lujan and others
Plaintiff:
Michael V Lujan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUNDY v. FORD et al
as 1:2018cv00072
Plaintiff:
MYLES E LUNDY, JR
Defendant:
BENJAMIN FORD, DARRELL WARREN, GREGORY DOZIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEYTON v. PFIZER et al
as 2:2017cv00421
Defendant:
ANGELA DEWEESE, ELI LILLY & CO., IU MEDICAL CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR E. PEYTON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
