Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Williams v. Bishop et al
as 8:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Xavier T. Williams
Defendant:
Michael B. Bishop, Marcus J. Bailey, Steven D. Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson-Bey v. Carlton et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Shakeel Jhakeel Jacksonbey and Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey
Defendant:
E.K. Carlton, J. Burkett, FNU Cordero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bailey v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00210
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Bailey
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brewer v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah D. Brewer
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, J. Bailey, f/n/u Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Thurston County et al
as 3:2022cv05972
Petitioner:
Jared J Bailey
Respondent:
Thurston County and City of Olympia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. United States of America Case electronically transferred to the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division.
as 4:2022cv03320
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Bailey
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Moore v. Hill et al
as 2:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Sidni Alfred Moore
Defendant:
Rick Hill, L. Johnson, W. Critz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEBARR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2021cv00233
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE LEBARR
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, T CHILDREE, J BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. TONY et al
as 1:2021cv02657
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO J. ELLIS
Defendant:
TONY, GARY, LOCKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
