Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Kelly v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00772
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Kelly
Defendant:
State of Missouri and Judge William J Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Peters v. Bowers
as 2:2022cv02440
Petitioner:
Michael J. Peters
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(PC) Springfield v. Axlex et al
as 2:2021cv00336
Defendant:
C. Barrow, Cook, J. Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Ciron B. Springfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. SELLERS et al
as 2:2021cv00660
Defendant:
DEREK WHITE, PAMELA SELLERS, MR. J. PETERS and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN T. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Cole v. McFadden-Jensen et al
as 3:2020cv06400
Defendant:
B. Stacy, R. McFadden-Jensen, R. Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Stein Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. John and Jane Does
as 2:2019cv04495
Defendant:
Michael Siewert, M. Riley, Deputy Blade and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Bonner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARREN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2019cv00097
Defendant:
SUSAN CONINE, DOUG YUHOUSE, UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MORRIS BARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MUHAMMAD v. PETERS et al
as 1:2018cv03999
Defendant:
WARDEN, J. PETERS, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
KA'BA MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
(PC) Cole v. McFadden-Jensen et al
as 2:2018cv02596
Defendant:
B. Stacy, K. Hoffman, R. McFadden-Jensen and others
Plaintiff:
Stein Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Blanco v. Gregory Duncan, et al
as 17-55968
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BLANCO
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY J. DUNCAN, Primary Care Physician, BARBARA FELLOWS, Registered Nurse, CHERYL MALO-CLINES, Primary Care Physician and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
