Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Clervrain v. Dayton et al
as 0:2019cv00965
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lori R. Swanson, John Sandweg and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain v. Cooper et al
as 5:2019ct03056
Defendant:
Elaine Marshall, Roy Cooper, Mr. Joshua Stein and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain v. Brown et al
as 5:2019cv01219
Defendant:
Xavier Beccera, John Sandweg, Edmund J. Brown, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alimany Turay v. Jack Kavanagh
as 14-7649
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALIMANY ALUSINE TURAY
Respondent - Appellee:
JACK KAVANAGH, Warden, CALVIN MCCORMICK, Baltimore Field Office Director, THOMAS HOMAN, Director and others
Clervrain et al v. Samuel et al
as 3:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Menetirony Clervrain, Paul Abel, Gedeon Jean Gardy and others
Defendant:
Charles Samuel, Jeh Johnson, John Sandweg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jorge Ginart-Cabeza v. Warden, et al
as 14-13580
Petitioner - Appellant:
JORGE GINART-CABEZA
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Mohamed v. Hunter et al
as 1:2014cv00786
Petitioner:
Khalid Abdel Whab Mohamed
Respondent:
Donald Hunter, M. Yvonne Evans, Thomas Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ginart-Cabeza v. Stone et al
as 3:2014cv00037
Petitioner:
Jorge Ginart-Cabeza
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone, Jeh Johnson, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TOTINO v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2014cv00135
Petitioner:
FILIPPO TOTINO
Respondent:
ERIC H HOLDER, JR, RADD BEERS, JOEY DOBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ashalley v. Viator et al
as 6:2014cv00148
Plaintiff:
Kotei Ashalley
Defendant:
David Viator, Eric H Holder, Jr, John Sandweg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
