Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01770
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Edgar Vasquez v. USA, et al
as 22-55501
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDGAR VASQUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, FBOP Director / Central Office and others
Edgar Vasquez v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv07176
Plaintiff:
Edgar Vasquez
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv00833
Plaintiff:
Edgar Vasquez
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Carvajal and others
Gladney v. Madrid, et al
as 4:2020cv00360
Defendant:
K Lewis, D Madrid, Van Devender and others
Plaintiff:
Edward J Gladney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clervrain v. Keller et al
as 3:2019cv01118
Respondent:
J A Keller, Jason A Sicker, Jose Santana and others
Petitioner:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyer v. Burreal et al
as 5:2018ct03252
Defendant:
Stephanie Hollemback, Amy Bullock, Unnamed Federal Bureau of Prisons employees and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Keith Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manetirony Clervrain v. J. Keller, et al
as 18-40682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. A. KELLER, JASON A. SICKER, BEN BRIESHKE and others
Santana v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv01134
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Jose Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BENOIT v. KANE et al
as 3:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
AUNDEL BENOIT
Defendant:
RICHARD KANE, KATHLEEN KENNEY, J.L. NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
