Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Moore et al v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Joshua Moore, James W. Clark, Jr., Dalmar Mack and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Frank Strada, Gregory Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darvin v. Heritage (Meat-by-product Distributor) et al
as 2:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Michael Darvin
Defendant:
Heritage (Meat-by-product Distributor), Bledsoe County Correctional Complex, Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Dobbs
as 1:2021cv00418
Petitioner:
Joshua Moore, J.J. and Jay
Respondent:
Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Dobbs
as 1:2021cv00293
Petitioner:
Joshua Moore, J.J. and Jay
Respondent:
Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. USA
as 1:2021cv00263
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joshua Moore and Joshua J. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moore v. Wilson et al
as 1:2020cv00085
Defendant:
Prosecutor Kim Georghagen, Public Defender Eric Clark and Judge Steven Wilson
Plaintiff:
Joshua Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. United States Attorney General
as 5:2020cv00363
Respondent:
United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Joshua Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore (ID 85744) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv03083
Defendant:
(fnu) Ewing, Joe Norwood and Kansas Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Joshua Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone et al v. Nevels et al
as 1:2019cv00126
Plaintiff:
Kyle Smith, Joe Riley, Greg Robinson and others
Defendant:
CLU Screening, Ken Faulk, Reggie Nevels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
