Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
James Walton v. Jeffrey Fikes
as 23-6599
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES EARL WALTON
Respondent / Appellee: JEFFREY FIKES
Walton v. Fikes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv01998
Petitioner: James Earl Walton
Respondent: Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walton v. USA
as 2:2022cv00035
Petitioner: James Earl Walton
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Walton v. Fikes
as 0:2022cv00717
Petitioner: James Earl Walton
Respondent: Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walton v. Fikes
as 5:2022hc02071
Petitioner: James Earl Walton
Respondent: Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walton v. Fikes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv00506
Petitioner: James Walton and James Earl Walton
Respondent: Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McAlpin v. Clem et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2021cv00004
Defendant: Ronnie Perry, State of Tennessee, Dent Morriss and others
Plaintiff: Douglas Scott McAlpin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00469
Defendant: Joseph Danzey, Larry McCovery and Alabama Department of Corrections
Plaintiff: James Edward Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2020cv00595
Defendant: Joe Danzey, Alabama Department of Corrections and Larry McCovery
Plaintiff: James Edward Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Williams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01993
Respondent: D.K. Williams
Petitioner: James Earl Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?