Cases 1 - 10 of 43
PLACEK v. BLONA et al
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEPHEN PLACEK
Defendant:
BLONA, IVY and VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEPHENS v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2023cv00412
Petitioner:
JAMES STEPHENS
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STEPHENS v. MCMANN et al
as 1:2023cv01314
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEPHENS
Defendant:
OFFICER MCMANN, CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS, SGT. ETHRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEPHENS v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2023cv00376
Petitioner:
JAMES STEPHENS
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STEPHENS v. ZATECKY
as 2:2023cv00233
Petitioner:
JAMES STEPHENS
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STEPHENS v. ELDRIDGE
as 1:2022cv01473
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEPHENS
Defendant:
MYLA ELDRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. James Thorpe
as 22-6270
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES STEPHEN THORPE, a/k/a J1
Hoover-Freeland v. The State of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
James Stephen Hoover-Freeland
Defendant:
The State of Maryland, The Charles County Sheriffs Department, Blaec E Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carder v. Lamb et al
as 1:2021cv00074
Plaintiff:
James Stephen Carder
Defendant:
Billy Lamb, Sabrina Patterson, Richard Philips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division (CID) et al
as 9:2021cv00212
Plaintiff:
James Stephens
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division (CID) and Donald Muniz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
