Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Ziegler v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05381
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Scott Ziegler
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jeffrey Gundersen v. United States
as 24-1032
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Scott Gundersen
Respondent:
United States of America
Thomas Dewald v. French, et al
as 23-3268
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ANDREW DEWALD
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRENCH, Franklin County Prison, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER REED, Franklin County Prison, LIEUTENANT GARY ARTER and others
Adkins v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00653
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Scott Adkins
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02065
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cole v. Maricopa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2023cv01427
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Cole
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriffs Office, Paul Penzone, BM Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jeffrey Adkins v. Tonya Chapman
as 23-6666
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT ADKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
TONYA D. CHAPMAN, in her capacity as chair of the Virginia Parole Board, REVEREND A. LINCOLN JAMES, in their capacity as a member of the Virginia Parole Board, KEMBA S. PRADIA, in their capacity as a member of the Virginia Parole Board and others
Brasso v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Brasso
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gundersen v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Scott Gundersen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jeffrey Jones v. Craig Koenig
as 23-55290
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
CRAIG KOENIG, Acting Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
