Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Andre Carstarphen, Sr. v. Kennth Gillespie, et al
as 23-13037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE MAURICE CARSTARPHEN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNTH GILLESPIE, MATHEW SIMPSON, ROBERT H. SMITH and others
Carstarphen v. Gillespie et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen and Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Sr.
Defendant:
Kennth Gillespie, Mathew Simpson, Robert H. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Taylor v. Siems et al
as 2:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Taylor, IV
Defendant:
Siems, Cobble, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monteer v. ABL Management Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00756
Defendant:
ABL Management Inc., Timothy Durbin, Heather Westerfield and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Allen Monteer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monteer v. ABL Management Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00401
Defendant:
ABL Management Inc., Timothy Durbin, Heather Westerfield and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Allen Monteer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Lewis et al
as 2:2018cv00149
Plaintiff:
Joe Taylor
Defendant:
J. Lewis, J. Ma, M. Bobbala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hales v. Grisham et al
as 4:2017cv01965
Plaintiff:
Robert C Hales
Defendant:
Grisham, Joe Taylor and Richard Lisenbe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hales v. Grisham et al
as 4:2017cv00502
Plaintiff:
Robert C Hales
Defendant:
Grisham, Joe Taylor and Richard Lisenbe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Shepard et al
as 2:2016cv03608
Plaintiff:
Joe Taylor
Defendant:
J Adam Shepard, Bradley Beauchamp, Calley Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walls v. Director of Texas Department of Justice et al
as 4:2016cv02651
Plaintiff:
Terry L Walls
Defendant:
Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice, University of Texas Medical Branch - Chief of Staff and Joe Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
