Cases 1 - 10 of 18
COOK v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2021cv00136
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY and MICHAEL FARJELLAH
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE K. COOK, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00504
Respondent:
FDC Honolulu, Attorney General William Barr, United States Marshal Service and others
Petitioner:
Gregory K. Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Villarreal v. Cook
as 5:2020cv00278
Defendant:
Mr. K Cook
Plaintiff:
Samuel Villarreal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spells et al v. Cook et al
as 4:2019cv03217
Defendant:
Edward Staggers, Leshawn June, Richard Cothran and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Spells and Julia Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Hansen et al
as 8:2018cv00332
Respondent:
Brad Hansen, Scott Frakes and Department of Correctional Services
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Richard K. Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cothron v. Collier et al
as 5:2018cv00048
Petitioner:
Jonas B Cothron
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, NFN Pharr and K. Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bustillo v. Sanders et al
as 6:2017cv03334
Plaintiff:
Fernando Bustillo
Defendant:
Linda Sanders, M. Pearson, J. Espinosa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anthony Ellis v. Anthony Haynes, et al
as 16-1264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Ellis
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony Haynes, Warden, FCI Forrest City, Darrel Roberts, Corrections Officer (originally names as Roberts), William Baney, Corrections Officer (originally named as Bainey) and others
Ronald Hill v. Kathleen Maples, et al
as 13-3740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald L. Hill
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Maples, Physicians Assistant, FCI - Forrest City, Andres Molina Ossers, Dr., FCI - Forrest City, Amy Barker, RN, FCI - Forrest City and others
Hill v. Maples et al
as 2:2012cv00173
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Hill
Defendant:
K Maples, Andre Molina, G Tolliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
