Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Ballard v. Raymond et al
as 5:2023ct03265
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Ballard
Defendant:
Captain Raymond, Officer Molsey, Officer Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kittrell v. Brown et al
as 1:2023cv01059
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamont Kittrell, Jr
Defendant:
Brown and Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
KITTRELL v. SMITH et al
as 2:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
ANDRE KITTRELL
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, LIEUTENANT OLIVER, JEFF MEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kittrell v. Gates et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ulyessie Kittrell
Defendant:
Eric Gates, Jason Kormanic, Shawn McGlaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kittrell v. Darnell et al
as 9:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Toby Kittrell
Defendant:
Kate Darnell, Tara Kattell, Ryan Mickelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Kittrell et al
as 5:2022hc02110
Petitioner:
Robert S. Ballard
Respondent:
Sgt. V. Kittrell, Officer T. Smith, Officer Fina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kittrell v. King et al
as 6:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jason Kittrell and Jason Irvin Kittrell
Defendant:
Sherry L. King and Joe N. Robinson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Allen et al
as 1:2021cv01114
Plaintiff:
Arthur Marshall, Corey A. Sellers, Nathaniel Waddy and others
Defendant:
Mike Allen, Sgt. A Jackson and William Carrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. A. Robinson
as 21-6688
Defendant / Appellee:
WAUMMADI, MICHELLE WALKER, Counselor, A. BROWN, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Kittrell v. Shinn et al
as 3:2021cv08033
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Dennis Eugene Kittrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
