Cases 1 - 10 of 29
(PC) Goods v. Baughman et al
as 2:2023cv02790
Plaintiff:
Gregory Goods
Defendant:
David Baughman, C. Lacy, B. Scruggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman v. North Western Regional Adult Detention Center, et al.
as 7:2023cv00431
Petitioner:
Derrick Newman
Defendant:
North Western Regional Adult Detention Center, C/O Cooper and C/O Largent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman v. North Western Regional Adult Detention Center, et al.
as 3:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Derrick Newman
Defendant:
North Western Regional Adult Detention Center, C/O Cooper and C/O Largent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spann v. Warden Jackson et al
as 8:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamont Spann and Eric L Spann
Defendant:
Warden Jackson, Associate Warden Tisdale, Captain Captain Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Carter et al
as 0:2021cv02031
Plaintiff:
Nicole R. Smith
Defendant:
Stacy Carter, Eric Flavor, Audra Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Betts v. Pleasant Hill, Missouri, City of et al
as 4:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Officer Sidney Cumberland, Pleasant Hill Police Department, City of Pleasant Hill, Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Eugene Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Largent
as 6:2020cv01297
Plaintiff:
Rickie Miller
Defendant:
Rhonda Largent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. County of Macon Illinois et al
as 2:2020cv02203
Defendant:
Kenne Largent, Toby Walter, Jacob Warrack and others
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Jill Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Largent v. Bryany
as 5:2020cv00683
Petitioner:
Richard Bob Largent
Respondent:
Jason Bryany
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
