Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Taylor v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2020cv00865
Defendant:
Moore, Birshir, Hensley and others
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel I Taylor
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leo Ambler v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 16-2595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEO MICHAEL AMBLER
Defendant - Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director Michigan Department of Corrections, CARMEN DENISE PALMER, Warden, Warden, GREGORY SKIPPER, Deputy Warden and others
Urlacher v. Quigley et al
as 3:2016cv05912
Plaintiff:
Charles RP Urlacher
Defendant:
Kevin Quigley, Patrisha Lashway, John Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ernest May v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-41473
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERNEST LAROE MAY
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ambler #188312 v. Washington et al
as 2:2016cv00148
Plaintiff:
Leo Michael Ambler #188312
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Carmen Plamer, Gregory Skipper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turay v. Quigley et al
as 3:2016cv05190
Plaintiff:
Richard G Turay
Defendant:
Kevin Quigley, John Clayton, Mark Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bettys v. Quigley et al
as 3:2016cv05076
Plaintiff:
John E Bettys and Richard G Turay
Defendant:
Kevin Quigley, Mark Strong, Cathi Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
May v. Thaler
as 9:2013cv00010
Petitioner:
Ernest Laroe May
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
May v. Thaler
as 4:2012cv03738
Petitioner:
Ernest Laroe May
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Denise d Sant Angelo v. Fei Fang Lee et al
as 2:2011cv10735
Defendant:
Eric Beecher, Brian Cota, Robert Goodman and others
Plaintiff:
Denise d Sant Angelo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
