Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv00374
Petitioner:
Marvin Maurice Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
US v. Tyrone Williams
as 24-6108
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TYRONE MAURICE WILLIAMS
Wiliams v. Dahl et al
as 2:2023cv01172
Plaintiff:
Maurice Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Tyler Dahl, D Jacobs, Jennifer Staffaroni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wierzchowski et al
as 2:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Maurice Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Matthew J Wierzchowski and Lillion Weatherby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2022cv01124
Petitioner:
DEQUANTEY MAURICE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Eric Burgie v. Randy Watson, et al
as 22-2235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric C. Burgie
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Former Director of ADC (originally named as Wendy Kelly), Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Jada Lawson, Executive Assistant Director, ADC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Randy Watson, Warden, ADC (originally named as Watson), Mark Cashion, Warden (originally named as Cashion), Maurice Williams, Major, ADC (originally named as M Williams) and others
Hooker v. The People of the State of California
as 3:2021cv04228
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Maurice William Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. USA
as 3:2020cv02328
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Justin Maurice Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00994
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Steven Maurice Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Macomb Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2020cv10584
Defendant:
Nobert Fronczak and Macomb Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Maurice Williams
Interested Party:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
