Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Pickens v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Phares A. Pickens
Defendant:
Michel Jones, Sandy Bourrage, Vince Carter and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NICHOLS v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv02356
Petitioner:
Ryan Taylor Nichols
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND and Michelle Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jones v. State of Georgia, et al
as 1:2021cv01454
Respondent:
State of Georgia, et al
Petitioner:
Michelle Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00991
Defendant:
Deidra Wright, Alabama Department of Corrections, Wendy Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Michelle Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv01856
Defendant:
Rose P Snow, Deidra Wright, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Michelle Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. Jones
as 3:2020cv00325
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant:
Michele Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burral v. Jones et al
as 1:2019cv02621
Defendant:
Brockbridge Correctional Facility, Jessup, Maryland, Unnamed members of the supervisory team, John Doe Warden #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis William Burral and Lewis Burral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
White v. Webb et al
as 8:2016cv00034
Plaintiff:
Nicholas White
Defendant:
Wayne Webb, Ricky Foxwell and Michelle Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyons v. Clark et al
as 1:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
Chandra Lyons
Defendant:
Clark, Cox, Jeffery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
