Cases 1 - 10 of 13,667
Sims v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Wesley Robert Sims
Defendant:
Keith Miller, Joshua Finkley and Michael Cunningham
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houle v. Bangert et al
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Gilbert John Houle
Defendant:
Emma Lucille Bangert, Kristina Braaten, Altru Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bazile v. Wolcott et al
as 1:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Kenny Bazile
Defendant:
Julie Wolcott, Donald Uhler, Mark Rockwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawdad v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Dentrel Guillory Crawdad
Defendant:
Master Sgt Miller and Lt White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03552
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Miller (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01652
Petitioner:
Earl D. Miller
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Dickerson
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dean Miller
Defendant:
Stanley Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jolly v. Otey et al
as 3:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dale Jolly
Defendant:
Christopher Otey, Mike Miller, Wayne County, Illinois Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe v. Haynes et al
as 4:2024cv04103
Plaintiff:
Joshua Poe
Defendant:
. Haynes, . Stevenson, . Bryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxey v. Sivels et al
as 1:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Maxey, Jr.
Defendant:
Chap Sivels, Carpenter, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
