Cases 1 - 10 of 910
Day v. Holbrook et al
as 7:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Lantz Domoench Day
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Jessee Holbrook, Dr. McDuffie, Ms. Brookshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Arlean et al
as 4:2024cv03522
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Arlean and Dr. Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Randeep Singh Mann
Defendant:
United States of America, Unknown Bass, Unknown Barundo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MANN v. WARDEN
as 3:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL MANN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perales v. Walworth County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
Tony Perales
Defendant:
Walworth County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Pinkell, Superintendent Delaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Manns et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Alfred A. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer T Manns, Officer Halib Kahn, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Mann et al
as 4:2024cv03090
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Dr. Mann, Dr. Terique and Fennie Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingfield v. Clegg et al
as 1:2024cv02220
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Thomas Scott Clegg, Jeffrey Mann and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Mann et al
as 4:2024cv02378
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Defendant:
Dr. Mann and Dr. Sabben
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Sabbeen et al
as 4:2024cv02379
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Defendant:
Sabbeen and Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
