Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Nicori v. Viator et al
as 4:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Nicori
Defendant:
Brandon Viator, John O. Putikka, Rachel Duvlea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dury v. Unknown Remedy Coordinator
as 1:2023cv00823
Petitioner:
Matthew James Dury
Respondent:
Unknown Remedy Coordinator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Ballin v. Shepler
as 5:2023cv00038
Petitioner:
Matthew James Ballin
Respondent:
Randolph County Magistrate Ben E. Shepler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James v. Ms. Meade
as 1:2022cv01381
Plaintiff:
Robert Matthew James
Defendant:
Ms. Meade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Griffin v. Sergeant Daves
as 22-6779
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES GRIFFIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DAVES and JOSEPH PARLIER
Matthew Choy v. Southern District of Florida, et al
as 22-11908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES CHOY
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
James v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Matthew James
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Heath Taylor, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Jervis Brown, Hernaadis Harmon, Barry Cobb and others
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Heath Taylor, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faison v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Levi Faison
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
